Legal
IN PRODUCTION
The work, in aggregate. Not a pitch deck.
Every number below is the running total across delivered engagements, not a target and not a projection.
Aggregate across delivered engagements. Methodology available on request.
WHERE PROJECTS FAIL
Most AI projects fail in the sequence, not the model.
The model is rarely the problem. The order of delivery, review, and risk is where most engagements come apart.
| Stage | Typical process | Deep Mist process |
|---|---|---|
| Delivery | 6-18 month timeline | 1-10 day production (14-90 for native apps) |
| Result | Slide decks and recommendations | Working software in your environment |
| Risk | Budget spent before code ships | Production-ready V1 before budget drained |
| Review | Single-team QA | 3-model flagship review + human sign-off |
| Cost | Hourly, open-ended | Fixed price, fixed scope |
| After launch | Handoff document | 30-90 day support |
Where a typical engagement runs 6 to 18 months, bills hourly, and hands over slide decks and a document, Deep Mist ships working software into your environment in 1 to 10 days (14 to 90 for native apps) at a fixed price, behind a three-model flagship review with human sign-off, and stays on for 30 to 90 days of support.
SELECTED WORK
The builds, end to end.
Anonymized by industry, scale, and role. Each one opens the full build.
RELEASE DISCIPLINE
Three models. Zero blind spots.
Every line that ships is read by three flagship models in parallel, then signed off by a human operator before it reaches your environment.
OUR COMMITMENTS
Five commitments behind every build.
These hold on every engagement, regardless of capability, scale, or industry.
IN THEIR WORDS
The operators who ran it in production.
Sourced from delivered engagements. Attribution is by role and anonymized organization only.
The system caught clause conflicts our senior associates were missing, and every flag pointed at a real clause we could check. It is not replacing lawyers, it is making them faster.
We got the Monday block back. My team finally has time for analysis instead of data entry, and the numbers stopped breaking when a source system changed.
We expected a proof of concept. They delivered a production system in three weeks that our staff actually wants to use, and it never merges a patient record on its own.
This changed how we evaluate deals. We look at roughly twice as many targets now with the same team, and every line in the brief points back to a source we can check.
Our search finally works. Customers are finding products they did not know we carried, and merchandising still signs off on every batch before it goes live.


