DEEP MIST
AI
All case studies

Representative engagement Logistics Updated

Eliminating 20 Hours of Weekly Reporting

Twelve reports, twenty hours, down to zero touch.

Global logistics operator, 200+ weekly shipments, two-analyst operations reporting function

20h

weekly reporting load removed

12

reports fully automated

1 week

kickoff to production

2

analysts moved to strategic work

THE SITUATION

Why this work mattered

The operator runs routes across multiple regions and feeds 12 recurring operational reports to department heads every week. Two analysts produced them by hand every Monday, pulling from a TMS, a WMS, and a custom Excel tracker. Consolidation alone took about six hours; the remaining 14 went to formatting, charting, and distribution. Independent logistics benchmarks put roughly a quarter of a rep's time, about one full day a week, lost to disconnected-system overhead, and a loaded analyst seat is a six-figure cost all in (operations and BI analyst total compensation runs roughly 80,000 to 112,000 dollars before benefits and overhead). The commercial stake was a compounding one: every new data source and every new report request widened a manual seam, and two skilled analysts were spending their week on data entry instead of analysis.

THE FAILURE MODE

What was breaking before us

The reporting load grew faster than the team could absorb it. New sources were added, report requests increased, and the analysts were burning out on a fixed Monday block that could not scale. Spreadsheet macros and one-off scripts had been used to paper over individual reports, but each broke whenever a source system changed a field or a report owner asked for a new cut, and a brittle script that silently produces a wrong number is worse than an honest manual one. The pattern was clear and why those stopgaps failed was structural: point fixes on a multi-system manual process do not remove the seam, they move it.

THE BUILD

What we built

We mapped all 12 reports on day one and found 10 could run with zero human intervention; the remaining two needed a 10-minute review before distribution. We built a Python pipeline that connects to all three source systems by API, runs extraction and consolidation on a Monday 4am schedule, generates the PDF and Excel outputs from a template engine, and distributes by email automatically. A lightweight web dashboard gives department heads a live view between Monday distributions, so the weekly cadence is no longer the only window into the numbers.

Automated weekly-report dashboard showing the 12 operational reports and their last run status
Automated weekly-report dashboard showing the 12 operational reports and their last run status

HOW IT WORKS

How it actually works

Dataflow diagram: TMS, WMS, and Excel tracker into a scheduled pipeline, normalise, render to PDF and Excel, 10-minute review on two reports, automated distribution

The pipeline pulls from the TMS, WMS, and Excel tracker over their APIs, normalises the three schemas into one consolidated dataset with Pandas, and renders the report set through a template engine to PDF and Excel before the email distribution step. It runs unattended on an AWS Lambda schedule with S3 for artifact storage and PostgreSQL for the consolidated state. The human boundary is deliberately small and explicit: 10 of the 12 reports are fully unattended, and the two that carry interpretive risk hold for a 10-minute human review before they go out, so a person signs off exactly where judgement matters and nowhere it does not.

The system carries the volume. A person carries every judgement call.

THE OUTCOMES

The outcomes that held

Every number below carries its denominator, window, and scope. No claim a buyer with a calculator can break.

20h

weekly reporting load removed

combined weekly reporting time for the two-analyst functionevery reporting week post-cutoverthe 12 recurring operational reports; ad-hoc analyst requests excluded

12

reports fully automated

the 12 recurring reports in the Monday blockeach weekly cycle10 fully unattended, 2 with a 10-minute pre-distribution review

1 week

kickoff to production

single engagementkickoff to first automated Monday runpipeline build plus API connection to TMS, WMS, and the Excel tracker

2

analysts moved to strategic work

the two analysts who owned the Monday blockongoing post-cutovertime reallocated to analysis, not a headcount reduction

SECOND-ORDER EFFECTS

The two analysts moved off the Monday block onto the analysis the reports were supposed to support. The live dashboard changed the rhythm: department heads stopped waiting for Monday to see where things stood. Because the pipeline owns the consolidation, adding a future source is a pipeline change rather than a new permanent manual chore, which removed the compounding problem rather than just the current instance of it.

We got the Monday block back. My team finally has time for analysis instead of data entry, and the numbers stopped breaking when a source system changed.

Head of OperationsGlobal logistics operator, 200+ weekly shipments

RELATED WORK

More of this work

The same shared system, applied to four other regulated and high-volume problems.

Tell us the problem. We'll scope the path.

Tell us the problem, the constraint, and what success looks like. We'll tell you whether there's a credible path to production.